8GB VS 16GB RAM BF5 PC

I would absolutely love to have more market saturation of cards above 8gb for the consumer segment. Who knows, all I know is this wait is killing me. AMD could repurpose this tech for their new GPU's in order to give them an extra advantage and to not hinder production costs of having 16-20GB+ physical memory chips on the board. Apparently AMD and Sony worked 'extra close' together on the PS5. MAYBE something similar to what the PS5 is using for their SSD en as, you know. Leveraging the sheer speed and low latency of HBM coupled with a compression/decompression controller onboard. The same goes for AMD, but I think AMD will also pull a HBM2 (or HBM2E) GPU out of their hats with an improved/new generation HBCC. Turning an 8GB GPU effectively into around a 12-14GB GPU, and 12GB GPU into a 16-18GB GPU depending on compression rates. Maybe leveraging the tensor cores in some way to help compress/decompress memory on the fly. I think Nvidia is going to be pulling some new technology out of their hats to rival AMD's HBCC. I would love 16GB or 24GB cards but I don't see this happening, as I think this would add a massive cost to each GPU having so much of something so new which would be cutting into Nvidia and AMD's margins. Forgive my VR fanboy nature But, I'm Excited.

8GB VS 16GB RAM BF5 PC

That's where that extra memory on one card, low latency small form factor do it all PC is the potential dream. I can't ask for better VR Res than the HP G2 Reverb, but more super sampling would be the cherry on cake. In the case of VR, these new cards seem to have the potential to have VR and also AR finally realized as the dream set up for the masses/Me, 120hrz 4k VR. I agree for what's out there for monitors seems more than enough and what's the point. So, this will be where if this coming Gen can do better than the 2080ti the way the 2080ti was supposed to do over the 1080ti and VR could become native for a more uses, then I would feel super excited. Though now, the 1080ti card is starting to somewhat struggle with the HP G2 Reverb, although still amazing and at times, but rarely nauseating, the VR looks better than my Monitor. My 1080ti has been and is still is enough for all available stuff out there, or at least up until this year. I got a 2080ti over my 1080ti, used it and saw minor properly working improvements, so I turned around and sold it at a $200 profit. the 2080ti was not quite there yet and all the VR enthusiasts might be feeling the same. I have been putting money away for the next worthy card and this may be it. Well, from my point of view, who uses VR everyday for more than 2hrs a day, I'd say yes. I see a lot of people asking 'is it necessary - 4k w/10+ g Mem', Now if only NVIDIA and AMD would allow for checker boarding, us couch gamers would be laughing! I'd rather have a smooth 60FPS with max details than sit 3' away from the screen counting pixels on grass in the distance. like the ugliness of a soft, shimmering, or ghosting image). Unlike the majority of computer monitors (like my Samsung 27' 1440P 144Hz gaming Monitor), (most) mid-high end HDTVs these days have great up-converters so gaming at a non-native resolution isn't really an issue (i.e. I remember old arguments with co-workers on why a smartphone with a 4K display is both impractical and laughable.įrom my own experience gaming on my 49' 4K Samsung QLED, sitting 9-10' away (depending if I am leaning forward or sitting back on the couch) I can not see much of a difference between 1440P and 2160P, especially when I am actually 'playing' the game. The tech savvy user sees big numbers and thinks their tech is out-dated. The average consumer sees bigger numbers and thinks that is superior. Click to expand.This Gen-X Canuck fully agrees.

8gb vs 16gb ram bf5